On my report I want to place two matrix data regions, whereas the second
matrix data region is placed exactly below the first matrix data region -
without spacing.
The first matrix shows the data with the numbers for the year 2006 and the
second matrix shows exactly the same data but with the numbers for the year
2005 ! So I donâ't want to show the column header for the second matrix data
region again. Therefore I set the visibility of the column header textboxes
to hidden and the column header is not shown as expected.
But a spacing remains between the two matrix data regions and I donâ't know
how to to eliminate it. The spacing has the size (height) of the hidden
column header text boxes. Also rendering the report in Excel doesnâ't give the
correct result. I also want to avoid overlapping report items because this
will probably produce rendering problems too.
Who can help to get rid of the remaing spacing between the two matrix data
regions !?
Any hints are welcome !Try selecting the whole row of your column header, and set the Height (not
LineHeight) to 0.01cm (or whatever your measurements are.)
Also, make the background colour for the row the same as the cells under it,
making it look like the top cells are slightly bigger than the rest.
Kaisa M. Lindahl Lervik
"Timmo" <Timmo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A1D86284-DBE1-4BE8-9881-CED568E6D938@.microsoft.com...
> On my report I want to place two matrix data regions, whereas the second
> matrix data region is placed exactly below the first matrix data region -
> without spacing.
> The first matrix shows the data with the numbers for the year 2006 and the
> second matrix shows exactly the same data but with the numbers for the
> year
> 2005 ! So I don't want to show the column header for the second matrix
> data
> region again. Therefore I set the visibility of the column header
> textboxes
> to hidden and the column header is not shown as expected.
> But a spacing remains between the two matrix data regions and I don't know
> how to to eliminate it. The spacing has the size (height) of the hidden
> column header text boxes. Also rendering the report in Excel doesn't give
> the
> correct result. I also want to avoid overlapping report items because this
> will probably produce rendering problems too.
> Who can help to get rid of the remaing spacing between the two matrix data
> regions !?
> Any hints are welcome !
>|||Try selecting the whole row of your column header, and set the Height (not
LineHeight) to 0.01cm (or whatever your measurements are.)
Also, make the background colour for the row the same as the cells under it,
making it look like the top cells are slightly bigger than the rest.
Kaisa M. Lindahl Lervik
"Timmo" <Timmo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A1D86284-DBE1-4BE8-9881-CED568E6D938@.microsoft.com...
> On my report I want to place two matrix data regions, whereas the second
> matrix data region is placed exactly below the first matrix data region -
> without spacing.
> The first matrix shows the data with the numbers for the year 2006 and the
> second matrix shows exactly the same data but with the numbers for the
> year
> 2005 ! So I don't want to show the column header for the second matrix
> data
> region again. Therefore I set the visibility of the column header
> textboxes
> to hidden and the column header is not shown as expected.
> But a spacing remains between the two matrix data regions and I don't know
> how to to eliminate it. The spacing has the size (height) of the hidden
> column header text boxes. Also rendering the report in Excel doesn't give
> the
> correct result. I also want to avoid overlapping report items because this
> will probably produce rendering problems too.
> Who can help to get rid of the remaing spacing between the two matrix data
> regions !?
> Any hints are welcome !
>|||Hi Kaisa !
Thank you very much for your answer ! Unfortunately your hint didn't help. I
already tried to set the height of the row with the column headers to 0 cm
and also setting the height to 0.01 cm couldn't help because the system sets
the height automatically to 0.07937cm which seems to be some minimal height !?
Nevertheless, if another idea comes to your mind, I would appriciate it a lot.
Regards
Timmo
"Kaisa M. Lindahl Lervik" wrote:
> Try selecting the whole row of your column header, and set the Height (not
> LineHeight) to 0.01cm (or whatever your measurements are.)
> Also, make the background colour for the row the same as the cells under it,
> making it look like the top cells are slightly bigger than the rest.
> Kaisa M. Lindahl Lervik
> "Timmo" <Timmo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A1D86284-DBE1-4BE8-9881-CED568E6D938@.microsoft.com...
> > On my report I want to place two matrix data regions, whereas the second
> > matrix data region is placed exactly below the first matrix data region -
> > without spacing.
> > The first matrix shows the data with the numbers for the year 2006 and the
> > second matrix shows exactly the same data but with the numbers for the
> > year
> > 2005 ! So I don't want to show the column header for the second matrix
> > data
> > region again. Therefore I set the visibility of the column header
> > textboxes
> > to hidden and the column header is not shown as expected.
> >
> > But a spacing remains between the two matrix data regions and I don't know
> > how to to eliminate it. The spacing has the size (height) of the hidden
> > column header text boxes. Also rendering the report in Excel doesn't give
> > the
> > correct result. I also want to avoid overlapping report items because this
> > will probably produce rendering problems too.
> >
> > Who can help to get rid of the remaing spacing between the two matrix data
> > regions !?
> > Any hints are welcome !
> >
>
>
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment