Please help - Named instances and full-text search

I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
a sql server 2005 named
instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
assume that each
instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
catalog files?
Hi Derek
"Derek" wrote:

> I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
> i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
> a sql server 2005 named
> instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
> assume that each
> instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
> catalog files?
>
The location for the FTS catalogs can be specified using the ON PATH
parameter of the CREATE FULLTEXT CATALOG command
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ms189520.aspx
or by us filling in the Catalog location in the dialog presented on SSMS
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms183531.aspx
Each instance has it's own FTS service therefore they can be configured
separately.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142490.aspx
and (I believe) there is an option to specify the default directory during
setup.
John

Please help - Named instances and full-text search

I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
a sql server 2005 named
instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
assume that each
instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
catalog files?Hi Derek
"Derek" wrote:

> I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
> i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
> a sql server 2005 named
> instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
> assume that each
> instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
> catalog files?
>
The location for the FTS catalogs can be specified using the ON PATH
parameter of the CREATE FULLTEXT CATALOG command
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ms189520.aspx
or by us filling in the Catalog location in the dialog presented on SSMS
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms183531.aspx
Each instance has it's own FTS service therefore they can be configured
separately.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142490.aspx
and (I believe) there is an option to specify the default directory during
setup.
Johnsql

Please help - Named instances and full-text search

I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
a sql server 2005 named
instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
assume that each
instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
catalog files?Hi Derek
"Derek" wrote:
> I asked this last week and no one replied :-(
> i have a sql server 2000 default instance and i'm planning on adding
> a sql server 2005 named
> instance to the server. both will be using full text search. i
> assume that each
> instance should be assigned separate directories for their full text
> catalog files?
>
The location for the FTS catalogs can be specified using the ON PATH
parameter of the CREATE FULLTEXT CATALOG command
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ms189520.aspx
or by us filling in the Catalog location in the dialog presented on SSMS
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms183531.aspx
Each instance has it's own FTS service therefore they can be configured
separately.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142490.aspx
and (I believe) there is an option to specify the default directory during
setup.
John

PLASE HELP - remote connectivity to named instance of 2005

Hi all,
I just installed version 2005, and it is co-existing with
an instance of 2000. I am trying to test the remote connection string from
an ASP .Net page which works fine already in 2000. However it does not work
in 2005.
In 2005, I went to configuration Manager/Protocols/TCP IP, and entered 7544
as the default port, and for port value in IP1, IP2, and IP3. Then, in my
connection string I just included the port number, and changed the
databasename to point to 'AdventureWorks' instead of the DB that I used for
2K. The connection could not be openned. I also configured the user id, and
password the same way as I have in 2K, and re-started the engine.
This is a sample of my connection string:
this.sqlConnection1.ConnectionString =
"Server=xxx.xx.xx.xx\\<myNamedServerInstance>,7544;Database=AdventureWorks;U
ser
ID=myUID;Password=myPWD;Trusted_Connecti
on=True";
I tested the local connection to this server/Database, and it works fine,
however, there is a problem with the remote connection.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
CarlosNever mind.. I got it Thanks.
"Carlos" <chsanin@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:uaKDKFB5FHA.2560@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> I just installed version 2005, and it is co-existing with
> an instance of 2000. I am trying to test the remote connection string from
> an ASP .Net page which works fine already in 2000. However it does not
> work in 2005.
> In 2005, I went to configuration Manager/Protocols/TCP IP, and entered
> 7544 as the default port, and for port value in IP1, IP2, and IP3. Then,
> in my connection string I just included the port number, and changed the
> databasename to point to 'AdventureWorks' instead of the DB that I used
> for 2K. The connection could not be openned. I also configured the user
> id, and password the same way as I have in 2K, and re-started the engine.
> This is a sample of my connection string:
> this.sqlConnection1.ConnectionString =
> "Server=xxx.xx.xx.xx\\<myNamedServerInstance>,7544;Database=AdventureWorks
;User
> ID=myUID;Password=myPWD;Trusted_Connecti
on=True";
> I tested the local connection to this server/Database, and it works fine,
> however, there is a problem with the remote connection.
> Any help will be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance,
> Carlos
>

PLASE HELP - remote connectivity to named instance of 2005

Hi all,
I just installed version 2005, and it is co-existing with
an instance of 2000. I am trying to test the remote connection string from
an ASP .Net page which works fine already in 2000. However it does not work
in 2005.
In 2005, I went to configuration Manager/Protocols/TCP IP, and entered 7544
as the default port, and for port value in IP1, IP2, and IP3. Then, in my
connection string I just included the port number, and changed the
databasename to point to 'AdventureWorks' instead of the DB that I used for
2K. The connection could not be openned. I also configured the user id, and
password the same way as I have in 2K, and re-started the engine.
This is a sample of my connection string:
this.sqlConnection1.ConnectionString =
"Server=xxx.xx.xx.xx\\<myNamedServerInstance>,7544 ;Database=AdventureWorks;User
ID=myUID;Password=myPWD;Trusted_Connection=True";
I tested the local connection to this server/Database, and it works fine,
however, there is a problem with the remote connection.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Carlos
Never mind.. I got it Thanks.
"Carlos" <chsanin@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:uaKDKFB5FHA.2560@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi all,
> I just installed version 2005, and it is co-existing with
> an instance of 2000. I am trying to test the remote connection string from
> an ASP .Net page which works fine already in 2000. However it does not
> work in 2005.
> In 2005, I went to configuration Manager/Protocols/TCP IP, and entered
> 7544 as the default port, and for port value in IP1, IP2, and IP3. Then,
> in my connection string I just included the port number, and changed the
> databasename to point to 'AdventureWorks' instead of the DB that I used
> for 2K. The connection could not be openned. I also configured the user
> id, and password the same way as I have in 2K, and re-started the engine.
> This is a sample of my connection string:
> this.sqlConnection1.ConnectionString =
> "Server=xxx.xx.xx.xx\\<myNamedServerInstance>,7544 ;Database=AdventureWorks;User
> ID=myUID;Password=myPWD;Trusted_Connection=True";
> I tested the local connection to this server/Database, and it works fine,
> however, there is a problem with the remote connection.
> Any help will be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance,
> Carlos
>